• beta testers?


    i'm looking for some people who wouldn't mind testing out my beta version of feedreader...i'm simply looking for some better feedback rather than releasing and then fixing...hoping the feedback can make it better...

    additionally, i've been wondering, does an ui web part pack installer help? or do people simply use the stsadm.exe tool anyway.

    if you are interested in testing, please let me know via email.

    Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:04 PM

    PostTypeIcon

Comments.

  • paulin said:
    Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    would not mind helping out ......where can i get more details?

    12/2/2003 9:05 PM
  • Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    Hello Tim,

    I am very interested in testing your Web part. Additionally, I give a presentation at the Belgium Developer Days in February regarding collaboration (Sharepoint/Office...). I also need to explain the concept of blogging to the audience. Your feedreader could be in the list of tools I am going to show.

    BTW: I think stsadm.exe still is the favorite of the developer.

    12/7/2003 12:56 AM
  • Tony Bland said:
    Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    I would be interested in testing your web part, I found the original Feedreader looked great for sharepoint sites but didn't work with our proxy.

    12/16/2003 5:20 AM
  • Jan said:
    Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    I'm using your first version! I definitly would like to test this version.

    Let me know!

    Jan

    12/17/2003 10:43 AM
  • Gary said:
    Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    Would be happy to test. Using the first version internally and works great. Let me know :)

    12/30/2003 11:51 AM
  • Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    Signing up for a beta test...

    2.2 looks nice.

    1/19/2004 12:38 PM
  • Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    If you're still after testers for 2.2 let me know via my site

    1/19/2004 2:25 PM
  • dean said:
    Gravatar
    # re: beta testers?


    i would like to become a tester

    2/22/2005 5:54 AM

Your Reply.

  Comment Form  

Fields denoted with a "*" are required.

*Your name:
Subject:
Your blog:
Your email:  (will not be displayed)
*Your message:

 
Please add 7 and 3 and type the answer here: