Advertisement

silverlight on some free hosters

well, in my previous examples, i was using a free linux hoster.  i found another one that was much more reliable from a responsiveness standpoint, but found a snag and wanted to share.

you see on some free hosters, in order to be free they'll add banner adds to your pages.  for my purposes, who cares.  i signed up with this particular one and none of my samples were working.  huh, weird i thought.  until you look at the error message of 'unknown namespace' from silverlight.  ahh...

you see what the free host was doing was injecting their banner ad code into *every* served request.  so when the xaml page was requested, it was being injected into the root of the xaml, thus putting in stuff like <div>my banner ad</div> before the root <Canvas> node.  the silverlight parser looked at that and said 'sorry man, homey don't play that.'

argh, off to find another...anyone know of a good free linux host (ad supported is okay as long as it doesn't do the above)?

  1. 8/26/2007 3:55 PM | # re: silverlight on some free hosters
    You can try some of these free shell accounts, some of them offer personal webspace.


    http://www.red-pill.eu/freeunix.shtml
  2. Gravatar
    8/26/2007 5:27 PM | # re: silverlight on some free hosters
    Don't you host timheuer.com at home? Run a virtual Linux instance on that box and serve out your SL apps from there?

    ai
  3. 8/27/2007 11:56 AM | # re: silverlight on some free hosters
    On a slightlyly related not, I found that my paid ISV would not serve files named XAML. Quick workaround was to rename this to .txt, which the Silverlight.CreateObject source still worked fine with.

 
Please add 8 and 3 and type the answer here:
First time here? You are looking at the most recent posts. You may also want to check out older archives. Please leave a comment, ask a question and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or email. Thank you for visiting! (hide this)