First time here?

You are looking at the most recent posts. You may also want to check out older archives. Please leave a comment, ask a question and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or email. Thank you for visiting!

A while back the team at the New York Times newspaper produced a digital reader for their content, dubbed ‘Times Reader.’  The technology powering that reader experience (“the digital newspaper that reads like the real thing”) is Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), part of the .NET Framework.  It is a remarkable experience for viewing digital news in a traditional format.  It provided online and offline reading capabilities mixed with some new and innovative ways of viewing related stories.

Portions of the reader were even transformed into a starter kit framework: Syndicated Client Experiences Starter Kit.  This kit provides the initial plumbing to produce similar experiences and truly is a great starter kit to use.  Others like the Seattle PI and MSDN have put their content via this mechanism.

This experience of the Times Reader was a Windows-only experience because of the dependency of the .NET Framework.  The Times Reader does provide the best experience because of this dependency however and it is important to note that.  Mac users, unfortunately, were left out.  Until now.

Rob Larson, VP of Digital Production for the NY Times, announced that they’ve been working on a Mac version and a beta will be released soon.  Rob’s team implemented this version using Silverlight.

“We are using Microsoft’s Silverlight technology to render the pages on the Mac version. Silverlight includes a subset of the Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) tools we use on the PC version. This allows us to keep the look and feel of the Mac version very close to the PC version and also allows us to reuse code across platforms.”  source: http://firstlook.nytimes.com/?p=46

I initially saw a lot of comments in the post about ‘why is this better’ and I think those are from people who haven’t seen the reader experience on the PC.  I have to admit that I’m not a newspaper reader at all, but as a geek, the news I do read is entirely digital…I’ve never owned a physical subscription to anything.  This digital reader experience is unique and fun to play around with (you have to see the search/related stories visualizations) and I think brings some freshness to traditional print news. 

Rob’s post has more screenshots and details about the implementation and future plans, including a comment of their commitment to bring feature parity between the versions.  I’m looking forward to seeing this implemented and hearing from the development team about their use of Silverlight to bring this experience to the Mac platform.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution By license.

5/20/2008 6:08 PM | # re: NY Times Reader on Mac with Silverlight
Interesting story, Tim. I was surprised to read some of the negativity from the Mac users about "not letting that Silverlight **** onto my Mac." And others were asking if it was successful when the Cocoa-based development would begin. They just don't get it, I think.
5/21/2008 5:29 AM | # re: NY Times Reader on Mac with Silverlight
Dear W Kevin,
Would you be so kind to explain us your last sentence, please?
5/21/2008 7:18 AM | # re: NY Times Reader on Mac with Silverlight
As a Mac user I was excited to hear that the NY Times reader would soon be available to me. I've been using it on my work PC and enjoy its features. However I'm more then a little disappointed to hear that it is using Silverlight.

I don't like installing Microsoft programs on my mac because they just don't work or complement the OS X experience. MS creates bulky applications that just don't play nicely with the rest of my system.

I hope that explains it Kevin.
5/21/2008 10:48 AM | # re: NY Times Reader on Mac with Silverlight
@titus: Thanks for your honest thoughts. I'm not sure why it is disappointing that it is using Silverlight if that is a platform that can bring that experience to the Mac. Microsoft makes some software for the Mac platform that has always been reliable and well liked in the Mac and student communities, namely Office. Outside of Office, Messenger, Expression Media, I can't think of other Microsoft-made software that has a bad name on the Mac (okay, I'll agree with IE). I am a Mac user as well as a Windows user and my Microsoft-installed programs don't interfere with my system at all...I don't know they are there unless being used, so your comment confuses me. With regard to Silverlight, it is only leveraged in browser-hosted instances similar to other plug-ins so it wouldn't even be used unless a site/application is leveraging that. I guess I'd ask not to discount the technology before you try it. If not, I'd ask what specifically you are concerned with about Silverlight?

Please add 3 and 7 and type the answer here:


The opinions/content expressed on this blog are provided "ASIS" with no warranties and are my own personal opinions/content (unless otherwise noted) and do not represent my employer's view in any way.