Advertisement

Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers

Something has been bugging me lately.  I feel I’ve become complacent.  And I think you have as well.  We all are surrounded by advertising daily.  Whether it be in print, audio or video, it is always near us in everything we do.  You cannot escape it…nobody can escape it.

Not even our children.

Perhaps this is what is driving my frustration anger.  You see, I have two kids ages 7 and 3.  My daughter (7) is in her second year of elementary school.  My son (3) is in pre-school.  Both are learning various things.  But learning also means questioning…A LOT!  Sometimes as a parent it can actually be frustrating the amount of questions you get!  But it is an opportunity to help my kids’ education and supplement with my own assistance, beliefs and perhaps help them further understand the things they are learning.

Ask yourself this…if your kids came to you and asked Daddy, what does ‘free’ mean? how would you define it?  What about unlimited?  My guess is that you will revert back to your own education and answer accordingly.  My guess is that you would not use the term ‘sometimes’ when defining these terms.  In fact, I would guess you’d follow that giant book of definitions we call the dictionary to assist you.

Here is how the term ‘unlimited’ is defined:

unlimited:

  1. not limited; unrestricted; unconfined
  2. boundless; infinite; vast
  3. without any qualification or exception

And here is ‘free’:

free:

  1. provided without, or not subject to, a charge or payment
  2. given without consideration of a return or reward
  3. not costing or charging anything
  4. not subject to rules, set forms, etc

Now I think any reasonable adult would agree as to this is your understanding of these terms.  I think you know where I’m going here.  We’re constantly surrounded by things that contradict not only our teachings to our children, but the literally meaning of things.  I’m not complaining about belief systems and things that are subjective in nature…I’m talking about the definition of words here.

The problem is that we and the elected government we have are allowing this to occur.

WHY?

Allow me to provide some examples.

Recently on the radio I heard an advertisement for getting a free laptop.  It was surrounded by all sorts of testimonials of people who have gotten their laptop.  I was waiting for the hitch.  You know the fast speak at the end that tells you all the terms and you can’t decipher them because you couldn’t possibly hear them how fast they talk (the audio equivalent of ‘fine print’).  There was none.  Of course I was suspicious.  Of course I knew it wasn’t free…but my daughter heard the same ad as well and said Dad, it’s free, I want a laptop.  I was stuck.  In reviewing their site, freeuslaptop.com you see the banner add with ‘participation required’ listed.

freeuslaptop.com banner image

Then in the fine print you read:

In order to receive your gift you must: (1) Meet the eligibility requirements (2) complete the rewards bonus survey (3) complete a total of 13 Sponsor Offers as stated in the Gift Rules (4) Follow redemption instructions.

The ‘Sponsor Offers’ of which you have to complete a total of 13 of them are things that are not free (one exception I could see).  Completing 13 of these would surely cost you a couple hundred dollars at least…maybe even enough to buy a decent used laptop on craigslist.

There is nothing that matches the English language of free in here at all.  The ‘free’ is bound to so many offers that are, in fact, bound to costs, subject to rules, charge payment.  There is no way anyone can look at me with a straight face and tell me that this is free at all.

You see these ‘free’ deals all over the place.  Mobile telephone carriers use this tactic as well with offering ‘free’ phones (in exchange for your commitment to a 2-year cost contract – again, ‘subject to rules’). 

Now let’s talk about ‘unlimited’ – this one also points most recently to the mobile phone industry for me.  I’ve been seeing advertisements on television about unlimited internet plans.  Of course television advertisements are the worst because of the fine print.  I have a large 50” HD screen and I still can’t read the paragraph of text in 4px blurred font that is displayed on the screen.  Why we feel this is an acceptable advertising practice is beyond me.

Of course, as a tech savvy person, you know that there is no such thing as ‘unlimited’ broadband.  It is another advertising shield for a bait to get you.  Unlimited to mobile carriers in the US is now defined as 5GB of usage.  Granted for most that should be way more than enough…but is that unrestricted as the definition of unlimited suggests?  Absolutely not – in fact they are defining the restriction of the unlimited deal.

Now all the online terms for the plans clearly spell this out (and not in fine print) so that is great.  But they are preying on the fact that people don’t pay attention to that.  I was trying to find one of the recent advertisements TV add on YouTube, but couldn’t (if someone finds one post it below).  One of my local carriers, Cricket, has a data plan that reads:

Now your laptop or desktop computer can have unlimited high-speed wireless Internet access on Cricket's 3G network.

However, here’s their lovely footnote at the very bottom:

Throughput speed may be limited if usage adversely impacts our network, service levels or exceeds 5 GB per month.

Hmm, sounds an awful lot like a restriction to me.

So what can be done?  Doesn’t seem like a lot without significant pressure to the FTC about these practices.  The FTC web site and process for complaining isn’t intuitive and isn’t really consumer friendly either.  A lot has been done about the mobile carrier ‘unlimited’ stuff – I see online the more prominent placement of specific data plans and very few are using the term unlimited anymore.  Still, this hasn’t changed their mainstream advertising channels like audio/video outlets.

I just hope that we’d all stop being so complacent about how we look at these things.  It’s becoming hard to explain to my children the oddities of how companies are redefining words and what my kids know to be true.

Rant over…had to get it off my chest how frustrated I am at these types of deceptive practices.  If you can’t succeed with your product by being honest, then your product sucks.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution By license.

  1. 2/12/2010 9:59 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    I agrE W u. itz impt 2 kip sum stdR.
  2. 2/12/2010 10:34 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

    But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

    Note that it says "government of the people, by the people, for the people".

    There is nothing in Lincoln's Gettysburg Address about a Government bought and paid for by big business to do the bidding of commerce. If government looks after the people then business will take care of itself.

  3. 2/12/2010 11:46 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    In the UK we have the Advertising Standards Authority which regulate the advertising industry and have been responsible for pulling ads that mislead and dealing with complaints from people who find the ads tasteless etc.

    http://www.asa.org.uk/

    I can imagine it's only going to get worse, perhaps now is the time for the US to get something similar.

    [)amien

  4. 2/12/2010 12:57 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Amen!
  5. 2/12/2010 3:29 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Unfortunately we reside in an office complex where people can come in freely. This means people selling junk. Sports tickets, cleaning service, phone service, you name it. One guy came in and bothered our entire company pimping tickets for go-karts. He said "anyone like go-karts?" ... I said "I only like go-karts that are free to ride, are yours free?". He said "Yes, after you pay for them". He said it with a straight face. I'm glad I laughed because I think my other reaction would've been to punch him.

    What's more, these people come in and interrupt our business and then act shocked when folks are rude and/or short with them.

    It's just ridiculous.
  6. 2/14/2010 5:51 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Tim, I really couldn't agree more. As Damien mentioned above in the UK here we have the advertising authority, but sometimes I really wonder If even they have the power they appear to.

    I recently had a big set-to with our national satellite TV operator sky, over claims on their website as to the use of their on line viewing system "Sky Player"

    In a nut shell, they state that you can set up an account, put in your TV account number and get instant on-line access to all the channels you have on your TV account free. This to me was great, due to the weather at the time (Snow and Ice on my Dish) I wasn't getting reception, so this seemed like a great alternative, esp since I have a network attached TV.

    I was very disappointed (and annoyed) to find that after I'd signed up that there where a number of things extra I either had to pay for or sign up to in order to get the TV channels that I already pay a substantial amount for.

    Unfortunately it would appear that the marketing boys are slowly taking over the internet, and are getting away with way way to much. IMHO they need to be stopped, and held accountable.
  7. 2/14/2010 6:36 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    You can largely thank the deregulation craze that Congress has been in really since the first Bush years, regardless of the presidents since. Regulation on what amounts to free speech has always been justified in the eyes of the courts because of the scarce and technically public resources involved (i.e., broadcast spectrum). The problem is that it might now be harder to go back in that direction because of the Internet, which might be viewed as equalizer of sorts. It would be nice to see some enterprising law firms try to test the courts in that respect, especially since much of the advertising you refer to is still taking place via the scarce public resource.
  8. 2/14/2010 8:10 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    As a father of two toddlers, two and four years young, I can't wait till they are old enough to watch commercials together and have a good laugh. I'd love to teach them how ads are designed to be deceptive. Ever since I bought a washing machine because of an ad showing a cat sleeping on it only to find out later that it was actually the noisiest machine available, I am looking forward to teaching my children how to avoid being deceived.
    That's Phase I. Phase II is to prepare them for an election in the US. I am not so sure whether I can help them master recognizing all the deception that is taking place in US politics. Luckily I still have a few years to prepare ...
  9. 2/15/2010 11:42 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Regardless of whether government or any other kind of regulation is the answer, I found myself in the same spot with my girls a few years ago.

    What I did was instill in them a degree of skepticism to everything they hear from the radio, watch on TV, or read on the Internet and elsewhere (basically assume it is a lie when it sounds too good and work toward finding proof to the contrary). It is a fine line between training them to have a measure of critical thinking and turning them into cynical persons, but with some care and patience it can be done.

    After much effort and coaching, I find that my kids, now 16 and 11, tend to think twice and look deeper when they come across words like free and unlimited and best and limited time offer and so on. They also tend to question things like percentages and so on if they sound like pulled from thin air.

    This is not to paint myself as a great parent (I am just an average dad, though heavily inspired by a great wife) but to highlight that we as parents can still have a large role in molding our kids' minds in spite of the sorrow state of some external influences, albeit is no simple task.

  10. 2/15/2010 9:29 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    The book Predictably Irrational has a great chapter on "Free".
  11. 2/15/2010 11:52 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    It's not much of an elected government, and it has been fallen to evil for at least 21 years. In a previous life, before becoming a software developer, I was 1984's "18-year-old" candidate for U.S. President, at which point I said: "There are very few people in this nation who could do a worse job as President than Ronald Reagan. Walter Mondale is one of those few." The thing is that I was young, innocent, and naiive. EVERY President since Reagan has done worse. The latest four Presidents, I would nominate to appear on "The Mount Rushmore of Corruption."

    But Tim, I think this problem goes farther back than that. Once in China there was Confucius, and he's known for his "rectification of names" campaign.

    His point was to use the right word for the right thing. --And that shouldn't be political at all! There is an identity principle, that A = A. I was also a Star Trek fan, perhaps I'm too damn logical, but many things "stand to reason" and it's amazing what you can see in our world (like the Mount Rushmore of Corruption) if you reason things out for yourself.

    In our line of work we care to get the booleans right, and we know how impactful one wrong boolean can be. But I also enjoyed Logic class in college, minding one's Ps and Qs and drawing truth tables with T and F (it's boolean!) and finding the logical tautologies.

    Whether the realm is commerce or politics, most hot air from corporate media is hogwash, rife with sophistry, and riddled with logical fallacies and Orwellian use of terminology. I support you in your anger about this matter! :)
  12. 2/16/2010 10:27 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    You speak out of my heart. I am a student at a Computer Science High School in Austria. So far, four of my colleagues got charged €192 (aprox. 265$) for downloading "free" software from the same website. It turns out the software was the DIVX player, which is really free, but this company is pretending that you have to pay for it. The funny thing, is, this seems to be legitimate business.
  13. 2/17/2010 9:35 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    I offer you my complete, wholehearted, unlimited and free support(1) in your crusade(2) against the advertisers(3) who practice these clearly deceptive and unwarranted(4) practices.

    (1)subject to terms, limitations, requirements of support, completion of pre-requisite requirements and availability in your specific area of coverage.
    (2)usage of the term crusade is used casually and in no way implies support or encouragement of acts of conquest or violence.
    (3)term advertisers is used to include advertisers, advocates, announcers, harbingers, originators, backers, boosters, publicists, marketers, sponsors, purveyors and proponents of the advertised product in question
    (4)term unwarranted to include but limited to baseless, flimsy, foundationless, gratuitous, groundless, indefensible, inexcusable, uncalled-for, unconscionable, undue, unfair, unfounded, ungrounded, unjust, unjustifiable, unjustified, unprovoked, unreasonable, unwarrantable and wrong
  14. 3/5/2010 12:54 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    Welcome to the fantasy world of Lewis Carroll (and advertising agencies):

    `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'


  15. 3/15/2010 3:48 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    The other disgraceful misappropriation of terms that I've encountered is when you go to your local electrical superstore and buy a TV or a refridgerator.
    Almost without fail, you'll be offered the chance to buy an 'extended warranty' or 'extended guarantee'.
    I usuallu polite decline the offer but, if the staff were able to communicate my feedback to their superiors (Or even understand my reasoning), I'd love to explain that the terms 'warranty' & 'guarantee' relate to a manufacturer's confidence in the quality of their product and the fact that - should something go wrong - they will rectify the problem free of charge (There's that 'Free' word again). The thing that they're trying to sell you is actually a service contract, or insurance policy.
    I think that deliberate misuses of English, like this, are much worse that just plain old uninformed illiteracy
  16. 4/2/2010 6:03 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    "As of April 1, it's illegal for companies to advertise 'free credit reports' that really are free trials for credit-monitoring services that cost money."
  17. 7/20/2010 5:32 AM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    So thanks for it.I hope you can continue this type of hard work to this site in future also..Because this blog is really very informative and it helps me lot.
    This is really interesting topic
  18. 8/26/2010 4:51 PM | # re: Big companies changing the English language – an open letter to advertisers
    I agrE W u. itz impt 2 kip sum stdR. This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality.I enjoyed every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.

 
Please add 3 and 3 and type the answer here:
First time here? You are looking at the most recent posts. You may also want to check out older archives. Please leave a comment, ask a question and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or email. Thank you for visiting! (hide this)