| Comments

the patch for windows mobile and united states daylight savings time is now available.  see the article and downloads here.

i also noticed that there was finally a daylight savings update on my OSX machine at home.  what struck me was the size.  on windows xp sp2 for example, the patch is 504KB.  on OSX the patch was 9.2MB.  wow, quite a difference...i'm curious why.

| Comments

attention windows vista team...

suggestion for SP1 -- remove the lame CTRL+ALT+DEL for machines added to a domain.  why should the logon experience be any different for a domain-joined machine?  is that a consistent user experience? why do i feel like when i CTRL+ALT+DEL that i still click on my name tile and login...essentially i'm clicking login twice i feel like.

please please please...remove that function.  i'm a developer...i understand that there may be some code that *must* be required.  but can't you just abstract that code?  why make me see the mess anymore...c'mon -- let's eat our own words on user experience and change some subtleties!

| Comments

in my first attempt i used fake targets to create server controls to wire up the animation extender, then during execution, changed the target and executed the animation.  a little kluge i thought, but it worked -- and under the cover essentially that's what happens anyway on a server control.

well today, ajax wizard and poker maven pointed me to a post where it talked about using the client libraries directly.  basically when you add an animation extender control it tells the runtime what client-side script references it will need.  so the first step is for us to do this manually.  to do this, we can take advantage of the <Scripts> element of the ScriptManager control and enter the scripts we need for our animation:

   1:  <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server">
   2:              <Scripts>
   3:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Common.Common.js" />
   4:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Compat.Timer.Timer.js" />
   5:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Animation.Animations.js" />
   6:              </Scripts>
   7:          </asp:ScriptManager>


after we have that, we can then use the client api's directly.  here's the example:

   1:  <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Default.aspx.cs" Inherits="_Default" %>
   2:  <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
   3:  <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
   4:  <head runat="server">
   5:      <title>Untitled Page</title>
   6:      <script type="text/javascript">    
   7:      function fadeOut()
   8:      {
   9:          var el = $get("fadeBlock");
  10:          AjaxControlToolkit.Animation.OpacityAction.play(el, 0, 30, 0.4);
  11:      }
  12:      </script>
  13:  </head>
  14:  <body>
  15:      <form id="form1" runat="server">
  16:          <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server">
  17:              <Scripts>
  18:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Common.Common.js" />
  19:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Compat.Timer.Timer.js" />
  20:                  <asp:ScriptReference Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Name="AjaxControlToolkit.Animation.Animations.js" />
  21:              </Scripts>
  22:          </asp:ScriptManager>
  23:          <div>
  24:              <div id="fadeBlock" style="width:250px; height:250px; background-color:Red">
  25:                  <input type="button" value="Fade Out" id="fadeButton" onclick="fadeOut()" />
  26:              </div>
  27:          </div>
  28:      </form>
  29:  </body>
  30:  </html>


as you can see the key elements are in the javascript function:

   1:  var el = $get("fadeBlock");
   2:  AjaxControlToolkit.Animation.OpacityAction.play(el, 0, 30, 0.4);


following the model of the client apis, we can directly call them without having a server-side wire-up of a fake control.  this will help with using microsoft ajax on non-microsoft platforms.  i do wish, however, that it could be simplified.  i suppose you could wrap the functions in a more simplified form into your own client side namespace.  let's say a company like, oh, i don't know wanted to do this, then they could essentially have the above line in something like:

Woodingo.Fade("fadeBlock", 0.4);

that would likely be much more appealing to developers.

| Comments

a while back i posted a gadget i wrote to demonstrate writing vista sidebar gadgets.  this was my msdn search gadget.

well, i am giddy that nikhil decided to use that model to improve it and leverage script#, which is something i'm deeply interested in.  check out nikhil's much improved msdn search gadget...installed.  it demonstrates some really cool features and brings script# as a model to develop sidebar gadgets...very very cool.

| Comments

i was in my local mac store (or is it apple store, i keep forgetting what the appropriate term is, i guess it is apple)...i was in my local apple store today and saw something funny.

first, i wasn't buying a mac, not that there is anything wrong with that.  i was getting a slim case for my laptop for short trips (my bag has become cumbersome).  i like that the apple store stocks a lot of options, something other stores don't.

anywhoo...upon checkout i noticed the current t-shirt for the store employees...i like how their ad campaigns blend into the store...very smart.  the shirt was black with a picture of an imac on the center (not very large).  underneath was simple type: "Go beyond Vista" is all it read.  (note: there was no marking about who the trademark of "Vista" belongs to -- maybe there's a lawsuit in there or something ;-) -- hey they've been using it a lot -- if microsoft used 'mac' i'm sure they'd get slammed for not disclosing the trademark owner).

the register clerk quickly noted my shirt as i was wearing a microsoft office 2007 branded dress shirt.  he smiled.  it went something like this:

clerk: do you work for microsoft?
me: yep.
clerk: aren't you not allowed in here?
me: (chuckle), actually i have a mac at home...
clerk (puzzled): do they know that?
me: i'm not sure who they are, but i'm not ashamed of it...it manages my movies and pictures well.  i like your shirt
clerk: i bet you do, do you want one?
me (excited): yeah!  can i really have one?
clerk: no, i just wanted to see if you wanted one.
me (under breath): arse-hole

it seems that apple is all over the place with this anti-vista campaign.  i think it is actually drawing more attention to vista.  they even started spamming people (and not getting favorable in their eyes) with the campaign.  i mean if OSX is so great, why not concentrate on those features rather than keep bringing up the fact that microsoft has a new operating system.  and prove the punchline...what is going beyond vista?  i mean some people seem to like the see through toolbar effect and are starting to port to OSX.

i, too, am amused with the apple ads and think they have a great advertising agency.  i wish microsoft would hire them.  but their ads have simply resorted to a virtual name calling.  if it is so bad, show why...at least point me to some comparison, maybe: www.apple.com/getthefacts? :-)  regardless, they are funny.

i guess apple must feel threatened if their are so aggressive about the anti-vista campaign...